Occasion/Purpose
It is
likely that the letter to the Ephesians was written during Paul’s imprisonment
in Rome. Sent with Tychicus the letter
was intended not necessarily to a specific audience, but to the churches that
had been planted in Asia Minor as a result of the missionary work that had been
done there. Due to the fact that it was
a letter addressed to a more general audience Paul refrained from dealing in
specifics, but instead offered “the implications of the gospel.”[1] The purpose of the letter, was not only to
deal with the implications of the gospel, but to offer some practical
application for Christian living.
Major Themes
The letter
begins by addressing the fact that the Church has been “blessed in Christ with
every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places”. The central thrust of the gospel message
appears in this first portion of the book where we see that those in Christ are
chosen in Christ; predestined; that they have redemption and forgiveness and
that they are claimed by God to be His own possession, marked with the seal of
the promised Holy Spirit. The major
theme being dealt with here is God’s redemptive work for the elect through
Christ.
Paul goes
on to talk about their identity in Christ.
He points out that first they were dead in transgressions and sin and
that they found themselves in bondage.
They were, as Paul puts it, by nature vessels of wrath. Paul contrasts this by showing that they are
now alive in Christ and raised up with Him through His grace. They are God’s own workmanship and they are
saved by grace. The contrast between the
old and the new life will appear later in the letter as well.
Paul shows
in the latter part of chapter two that the Gentiles are included in the
promise, that they have been “brought near” by the power of Christ’s blood and
that Christ destroyed the barrier that was between the Jew and the Gentile
where salvation was concerned. Two
nationalities represented by two men who in Christ are made one reconciling
both to God. The theme of inclusion is
strongly worded in the letter showing that the Gentiles are clearly a part of
the promise of new life in Christ. Paul
refers to this as “the mystery of the Gospel” being revealed. The inclusion of the Gentiles is expressed
metaphorically referring to them as “fellow citizens”, “members of the
household of God”, and “a holy temple in the Lord.” The thrust of this passage comes when Paul states
“In him you also are being built together into a dwelling place for God by the
Spirit.” (Eph 2:22)
Paul
stresses the need for unity in the Body of Christ, likely because of the fact
that there may have been some tension between Jew and Gentile believers in any
congregation of the time. There is a
call for humility and gentleness, patience and love in order to maintain unity
and peace. The idea of unity is emphasized
as Paul shows that there is one hope, one Lord, one faith, one baptism, and one
God. In the same way, there is one body
of believers. Paul lays groundwork for
how we can practically be in unity in the first half of chapter four.
New life in
Christ is another central theme to the book of Ephesians. The believers are encouraged not to live as
they once did, but instead to be “renewed in the spirit of [their] minds” (Eph
4:23) and to “put on the new self, created after the likeness of God in true
righteousness and holiness.” (Eph. 4:24)
Again, practical application follows the exhortation and Paul unpacks
what it looks like to put on the new self, which leads into the fifth chapter
and includes mutual submission within the body of Christ.
Paul
expands on the concept of mutual submission and gets into specifics of
submission within marital relationships, child and parent relationships and
bondservant and master relationships.
The key concept throughout all of these is a mutual submission that
leads to the spiritual growth of all involved.
Paul is not suggesting a hierarchy in these passages, but rather a community
that willingly submits to one another, the end goal being transformation into
the new self.
Finally
Paul shows us that “we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against
rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present
darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places.” (Eph.
6:12) There is more to the battle than
we see in the world day to day and Paul is pointing out the need to be fully
equipped. As believers they were given
armor with which to fight the enemy and Paul is exhorting them to do so and he
gives clear imagery that helps understand the function of each of the elements
of armor. Stand firm.
Application
for Today
Because it
is written as a general letter the application for Ephesians is not culturally
bound but is incredibly applicable to today.
First we see the Gospel message, which we are well aware, is timeless,
the truth and power of what Christ did is as relevant and useful in sharing the
message of Christ as it was when Paul penned this letter.
Identity in
Christ is central to the development of Christians, it is because of our
identity that we grow and change. If we
change for any other reason than our adopted identity then we risk falling into
a debtor’s ethic and thinking that we are somehow repaying something that God
has done. We must understand that the
outworking of Christ in us is a result of who Christ is in us first.
It almost
seems silly to have to point out the importance of unity in the body of Christ
today but we must address it. Earlier
this week I heard about a pastor who was bad-mouthing another local church. I know that there were some hard feelings
between the two but surely this is not a promotion of the kind of unity that
Paul is calling for in the letter to the Ephesians. This is an example a bit more on a macro
level, but on a smaller scale we see disunity even among members of the same
congregation, often over matters as small as choosing a new color to paint the
walls. It might be time to return to the
unity that Paul was speaking of when we are so easily divided over trivial
matters.
The idea of
community in mutual submission that leads to growth and new life is also very
applicable to today. The idea that we
should be renewed in our minds and see different conduct as a result is clearly
laid out by Paul in this letter. This is
timeless and fully applicable to today.
Do we really live in mutual submission that is driven by the desire to
see growth in other members of the body?
I think we might need unity to understand the model and to actually see
this take effect. Assuming that you have
unity, this message of submission that leads to changed lives becomes not an
individualistic venture, but a communal goal.
Imagine a community dedicated to growth in one another, this is the
vision Paul had for the Church.
All in all
the book of Ephesians has little cultural baggage that prevents us from
applying it to today. It offers a model
for Christ-centered community living that sheds light on the journey of
sanctification and relationship that leads to being the saints of the Body of
Christ.
Additional
Details on Ephesus
Ephesus was the fourth largest
city in the empire and “the most important city in the Roman province of Asia,
on the W coast of what is now Asiatic Turkey. It was situated at the mouth of
the Caÿster River between the mountain range of Coressus and the sea.”[2] Until about 100 B.C. Ephesus had relied on
its port as a main source of income. “A
fine street ran through the city (11 m wide) from the harbor warves at the
river mouth to the great theater where the level land began to rise toward
Mount Pion a boulevard of some beauty and lined by fine buildings and columned
porticoes. It was the main artery of
Ephesian life, destined in later years to be even more richly adorned.” [3]
One of the major exports of
the city at the time preceding 100 B.C. was timber. Unfortunately, due to massive deforestation
the earth around the harbor began to erode and the harbor began to silt up, not
allowing for larger ships to enter the port.
Over the years the problem would become nearly impossible to repair, and
by the last century B.C. Ephesus was undoubtedly suffering financial strain as
a result of lost trade.
Around the 15th
century B.C. however, a new stream of income would arise in Ephesus, the
worship of a pagan goddess would lead to prosperity once again. When the city was first founded “…the son of
Codrus, last king of Athens…placed his colonists near the shrine of an ancient
Anatolian goddess whom the Greeks, following the religious syncretism common in
the ancient world, called after their own goddess – Artemis.”[4] Artemis, or Diana was a pagan fertility
goddess whose worship rituals consisted of orgiastic rituals and temple
prostitution, a common practice among pagan worship of the time.
When the harbor became of
little use the Ephesians needed to find a new source of income for their city
and Artemis became their financial redeemer.
The goddess found her dwelling in what is deemed one of the seven wonders
of the ancient world, “It is said that the building was four times the size of Athens’
magnificent Parthenon.”[5] The temple that was standing at the time of
the early Christian church was not the original temple, but one that had been
rebuilt for the third time after having been destroyed in past wars. The magnificent building contained over 120
columns of solid stone, each engraved with beautiful detail and worshippers
came from all over Asia to worship the goddess.
With the worshippers came their money.
In what is the modern equivalent to the tourism industry, Ephesus became
a place where foreigners’ money would lead to abundant wealth.
As people would flood into the
city to worship the goddess they would bring with them hungry mouths, and a
need for bathhouses and places to sleep.
Even more profitable than the income from room and board was the silver
trade. Many in Ephesus would train to be
silversmiths and would then cast small, portable shrines of the Artemis, which
they would then sell to those visiting the temple. The goddess quickly replaced the income that
was lost by the silted harbor and Ephesus once again found itself among the
wealthier cities in Asia. It is in this
time of financial abundance that Paul would first appear in Ephesus, bringing
with him a message that threatened the very foundation of their newfound
wealth.
In what appears to be a very short visit Paul appears in Ephesus to
reason in the synagogue. His first visit
would be considered a success in that he is asked to remain in Ephesus and
continue teaching. It is clear however
that Paul had other business to attend to as he left them, insisting that if
God willed, he would return.[6] His subsequent visit would not result in such
a warm welcome.
Shortly after leaving Ephesus to continue his missionary work, a new
name would appear on the scene in Ephesus.
Apollos of Alexandria had “been instructed in the way of the Lord. And being fervent
in spirit, he spoke and taught accurately the things concerning Jesus, though
he knew only the baptism of John.”[7] After Priscilla and Aquila hear of his lack
of knowledge on the baptism of John, they take it upon themselves to train him
in the message Paul had earlier taught them, and he was sent off as a
missionary, to do the work of the Lord.
Shortly after Apollos leaves
Ephesus, Paul returns and discovers some disciples in that city. He asks them which baptism they had received,
and upon the response “John’s” he laid hands on them, and they received the
baptism of the Holy Spirit, spoke in tongues and prophesied. After this encounter with new believers in
Ephesus, Paul proceeded to the synagogue where he preached and reasoned for
three months. When conflict arises in the synagogue, Paul withdraws to the hall
of Tyrannus, where he would continue to preach every day for two years. During this time of teaching many miracles
began to take place. People were healed
and demons were exercised, but the most significant event was the public
burning of many books dedicated to magic arts as the people of Ephesus began to
turn to the message of the Gospel.
The author of Acts is sure to
mention the financial value of the articles being burned (50 thousand pieces of
silver)[8]
before narrating the riot that soon followed.
Demetrius, one of the silver smiths of the city, began speaking against
Paul and told his fellow guildsmen that Paul had said, “gods made of hands are
not gods”[9],
a statement that would threaten the silversmith’s very livelihood. As a result they dragged Gaius and
Aristarchus[10]
into the theatre to bring charges against them.
The riot took place in the theatre which some speculate held up to
25,000 people[11]. Paul wanted to go to see what would transpire
but was urged not to by some Asiarchs[12]
friends, not to go. After two hours of
chanting, “Great is Artemis of the Ephesians[13]
the crowd was finally calmed by the town clerk.
The riot ended and the crowd dissipated and shortly thereafter, Paul
continued on his missionary journey.
Some
time later Paul, heading to Jerusalem, would call the elders of the Ephesian
church together to commission them and to tell them they would not see one
another again. The heartfelt response of
the elders suggests that Paul’s involvement there was nothing shy of deeply
influential. Paul had spent time with
these leaders, training them to minister in this hostile environment.
[1] Frank E. Gaebelein and J. D. Douglas, The Expositor's
Bible Commentary: Ephesians - Philemon: With the New International Version of
the Holy Bible (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Pub. House, 1978), 16.
[2] Green, E. M.
B., & Hemer, C. J. (1996). Ephesus. In D. R. W. Wood, I. H. Marshall, A. R.
Millard, J. I. Packer & D. J. Wiseman (Eds.), New Bible dictionary (D. R. W. Wood, I. H. Marshall, A. R. Millard,
J. I. Packer & D. J. Wiseman, Ed.) (3rd ed.) (327). Leicester, England;
Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
[3] J. D. Douglas, Merrill C. Tenney, and Moisés Silva, Zondervan
Illustrated Bible Dictionary (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2011), pg. #326.
[4] J. D. Douglas, Merrill C. Tenney, and Moisés Silva, Zondervan
Illustrated Bible Dictionary (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2011), pg. #326.
[5] J. D. Douglas, Merrill C. Tenney, and Moisés Silva, Zondervan
Illustrated Bible Dictionary (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2011), pg. #328.
[6] Acts
18:18-21
[7] Acts 18:25
[8] Acts 19:19
[9] Acts 19:26
[10] Leaders
under Paul in Ephesus
[11] Various
sources citied similar statistics
[12] High ranking
officers in Asia
[13] Acts 19:34
Bibliography
Gaebelein, Frank
E., and J. D. Douglas. The Expositor's Bible Commentary: Ephesians -
Philemon: With the New International Version of the Holy Bible. Grand
Rapids: Zondervan Pub. House, 1978.
Holy Bible: English Standard
Version.
Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles, 2001.
New, Bible Dictionary. New
Bible Dictionary. Downers Grove, IL: Intervarsity Press, 1996.
New American Standard Bible. Anaheim, CA: Foundation Pub.,
1997.
Calvin, John. 1, 2 Timothy
and Titus. Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books, 1998.
Douglas, J. D., Merrill C.
Tenney, and Moisés Silva. Zondervan Illustrated Bible Dictionary. Grand
Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2011.
Erdman, Charles R. The
Pastoral Epistles of Paul: An Exposition. Philadelphia, PA: Westminster
Press, 1966.
Hendriksen, William. Commentary
on 1 and 2 Timothy and Titus. London: Banner of Truth Trust, 1959.
Hughes, R. Kent., and Bryan
Chapell. 1 & 2 Timothy and Titus: To Guard the Deposit. Wheaton, IL:
Crossway Books, 2000.
Knight, George W. The
Pastoral Epistles: A Commentary on the Greek Text. Grand Rapids, MI: W.B.
Eerdmans, 1992.
Lea, Thomas D., and Hayne P.
Griffin. 1, 2 Timothy, Titus. Nashville, TN: Broadman Press, 1992.
Liefeld, Walter L. 1 &
2 Timothy/Titus: The NIV Application Commentary from Biblical Text--to
Contemporary Life. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1999.
Stott, John R. W. The
Message of 2 Timothy: Guard the Gospel. Downers Grove, IL: Inter-Varsity
Press, 1984.
Towner, Philip H. The
Letters to Timothy and Titus. Grand Rapids, MI: William B.
Eerdmans Pub.,
2006.

What do you mean when you say that Paul taught "mutual submission?"
ReplyDeleteI am just curious, you write "Paul is not suggesting a hierarchy in these passages, but rather a community that willingly submits to one another." I take it that you are understanding αλληλων (allelon - one another) to be inclusive; each to everyone else. This is an interesting interpretation, for it seems to be contradicted by the immediate context and is completely impractical. I heard an example of the impracticality of this understanding in a small group a few weeks ago. A friend of mine was at work and had authority over a coworker, who was Christian. In a conflict, he was struggling with how to apply this verse to his situation: how does he submit to his fellow believer in this situation when he has clearly been put in a position of authority over his brother. Someone may say that this verse is more limited in scope, but in the immediately following context, Paul draws in the relationship of a slave to his master--of which the closest akin situation in today's west is that of an employee and his employer. Now, as far as the context contradicting this reading: v. 21 is a participle phrase that is subordinate to the main verb in v. 18. Paul writes: "do not get drunk with wine, for that is dissipation, but be (continually in a state of having been) filled with the Holy Spirit" (NASB). This is followed by three participles explaining what this looks like, in contrast with the works of the flesh (drunkenness); speaking..., singing..., always giving..., subject(ing). Now, the so called "household code" actually picks up on this last participle: Paul doesn't let us interpret "be subject to one another" however we would like, but he proceeds to give examples of what this looks like. This relationship is made clear in that the first imperative of the following section (the "household code") is implicit, it requires you to fill in the blanks from the previous vs. (21). It reads literally: the wives to their own husbands as to the Lord. "be subject" is implied from the "be subject to one another" in v. 21. That this is what is intended by Paul is further confirmed by v. 24, here Paul compares the Church with wives and says that as the church submits to Christ (same word as v. 21) so also wives should do the same to their husbands. He then launches into an explanation of the way that a husband should lead his wife, revealing the truth that marriage is a type of Christ and His Bride. In ch. 6, Paul uses a synonym to continue the theme of what submission looks like in different relationships found within the body.
DeleteThis relationship between v. 21 and the following verses casts serious doubt on the anti-hierarchical and mutual submission view. If that was the only way we could read αλληλους (allelous), then their may be reason to pursue that understanding and strive to reconcile Paul's seemingly fragmented thinking, but, fortunately, αλληλων (allelon) has a broader rang than that. A very common use of αλληλων (allelon) is distributive--or representative. That is, each person to another, not each person to every single other person. An example of this is the use of αλληλων (allelon) to describe the scene of a battle: the soldiers are said to have killed one another (αλληλων). What is not meant is that each and every soldier managed to stick their sword and kill each and every other soldier during the battle, that would be ridiculous; what is meant is exactly what an English speaker would understand reading "they killed one another". The soldiers were in the midst of a battle, the soldiers will killing each other, each one killing him who was conveniently located in the path of his sword.
Though Paul is not speaking of something so grisly, he is using αλληλων in the same way. He is saying that being filled with the Spirit looks like this: submitting to one another as he ought to submit. What does that look like? Wives, submit to the servant leadership of your husband; children, to the loving parenting of their parents; servants, to your masters--as long as doing so does not lead you into sin. This is supported elsewhere in Scripture by the fact that Christians are never told to absolutely to submit to each and every other Christian (though they are told to love and serve each other), but they are told to submit to authorities over them (Col 3:18, 1 Peter 3:1, [to an unbeliever, Rom. 13:1]). Both Col. 3:18 and 1 Pet. 3:1 echo Eph. 5:22f, but do not have the αλληλων of v. 21.
DeleteMany commentators follow the idea of mutual submission, so I know that that is probably where you are getting your idea; but one must ask, are they doing so because that is where the text is leading them, or because of an apriori acceptance of egalitarian philosophy. The burden of proof is surely on them, and--if you still agree with them--you, to show that despite the words semantic range and the surrounding context, it should be understood as "mutual" non hierarchical submission. To the average Greek reader, and the thinking Western reader, the reading I have suggested would be self-evident.
With love, your brother in Christ and friend,
James
Soli Deo Gloria
@allforthegloryofhiskingdom: When speaking of "mutual submission" I am referring to Eph. 5:21, where Paul is exhorting the entire Church to submit to one another. I assume you are referring to the verse that follows where wives are told to submit to their husbands, and the fact that I grouped that under "mutual submission"?
ReplyDeleteI would agree with your view that there is something very distinct about submission within marital relations, but I would also point out that in light of the fact that husband and wife both belong to the Church, there is a sense of mutual submission tied to the exhortation in verse 21.
Did my epic and long exegetical response go through?
DeleteIt finally came through! Thanks for the additional info James. I would certainly agree, and would suggest it is both/and. There is certainly a sense in which we submit to one another, but I think your exegesis really gives a more full understanding to the passage.
DeleteThanks for ye input, I appreciate it :)
Also, the parameters of this paper wouldn't have allowed for quite so much of an explanation lol
When you are back in town I can point out why I don't think it is a both/and :P . I am glad I could give it, I am always itching for an exegetical outlet. I get that, I am just triggered by the words "mutual submission." :P
DeleteI hate writing on blogs, I had one more little rant on the nature of mutual submission and its incompatibility with the idea of any form of submission... but when I posted it, my browser lost it :(
ReplyDelete